Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSundet, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hesook Suzie
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Bengt Eirik
dc.contributor.authorBorg, Marit
dc.contributor.authorSælør, Knut Tore
dc.contributor.authorNess, Ottar
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T10:50:04Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T10:50:04Z
dc.date.created2020-05-14T06:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSundet, R., Kim, H. S., Karlsson, B. E., Borg, M., Sælør, K. T., & Ness, O. (2020). A heuristic model for collaborative practice–Part 1: a meta-synthesis of empirical findings on collaborative strategies in community mental health and substance abuse practice. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14, 42.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-4458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739545
dc.description.abstractBackground: Collaboration has become a cornerstone for healthcare practice in recent decades resulting in the efforts at international and national levels to integrate the concept into healthcare practice and services. However, there is a paucity of research delineating strategies for professionals to apply in collaborative practice with clients in general as well as in mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) care. Methods: The method applied in this paper is a form of qualitative meta-synthesis referring to the integration of findings from multiple qualitative studies within a program of research by the same investigators. Eighteen empirical papers with the focus on community MHSA practice and recovery-orientation with relevance to the service user–professional relationship in MHSA practice were included in this meta-synthesis. Results: Three types of processes of collaboration specified by meta-themes were identified. The meta-themes of the interactive-dialogical process type include (a) maintaining human relationship, (b) walking alongside, (c) information sharing, (d) seizing the present moment, (e) taking the perspective of the other, and (f ) aligning/scaffolding. The meta-themes of the negotiated-participatory engagement type include (a) feedback-informing process, (b) putting differences to work, (c) negotiated partnering, (d) accommodating user participation, and (e) addressing the tension between help and control. The meta-themes of the negotiated supportive process type are (a) helping in context, (b) coordinating, (c) pulling together, (d) advocating, and (e) availing. These meta-themes are strategies for collaboration applicable in MHSA practice. Conclusions: This meta-synthesis of collaborative processes found in community mental health practice points to the possibility of developing a set of repertoires of practice for service user/professional collaboration, especially in community MHSA practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA heuristic model for collaborative practice – Part 1: A meta-synthesis of empirical findings on collaborative strategies in community mental health and substance abuse practiceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2020.en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Mental Health Systemsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00376-5
dc.identifier.cristin1810893
dc.source.articlenumber42en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal