Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSundet, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hesook Suzie
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Bengt Eirik
dc.contributor.authorBorg, Marit
dc.contributor.authorSælør, Knut Tore
dc.contributor.authorNess, Ottar
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T10:50:04Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T10:50:04Z
dc.date.created2020-05-14T06:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSundet, R., Kim, H. S., Karlsson, B. E., Borg, M., Sælør, K. T., & Ness, O. (2020). A heuristic model for collaborative practice–Part 1: a meta-synthesis of empirical findings on collaborative strategies in community mental health and substance abuse practice. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14, 42.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-4458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739545
dc.description.abstractBackground: Collaboration has become a cornerstone for healthcare practice in recent decades resulting in the efforts at international and national levels to integrate the concept into healthcare practice and services. However, there is a paucity of research delineating strategies for professionals to apply in collaborative practice with clients in general as well as in mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) care. Methods: The method applied in this paper is a form of qualitative meta-synthesis referring to the integration of findings from multiple qualitative studies within a program of research by the same investigators. Eighteen empirical papers with the focus on community MHSA practice and recovery-orientation with relevance to the service user–professional relationship in MHSA practice were included in this meta-synthesis. Results: Three types of processes of collaboration specified by meta-themes were identified. The meta-themes of the interactive-dialogical process type include (a) maintaining human relationship, (b) walking alongside, (c) information sharing, (d) seizing the present moment, (e) taking the perspective of the other, and (f ) aligning/scaffolding. The meta-themes of the negotiated-participatory engagement type include (a) feedback-informing process, (b) putting differences to work, (c) negotiated partnering, (d) accommodating user participation, and (e) addressing the tension between help and control. The meta-themes of the negotiated supportive process type are (a) helping in context, (b) coordinating, (c) pulling together, (d) advocating, and (e) availing. These meta-themes are strategies for collaboration applicable in MHSA practice. Conclusions: This meta-synthesis of collaborative processes found in community mental health practice points to the possibility of developing a set of repertoires of practice for service user/professional collaboration, especially in community MHSA practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA heuristic model for collaborative practice – Part 1: A meta-synthesis of empirical findings on collaborative strategies in community mental health and substance abuse practiceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2020.en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Mental Health Systemsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00376-5
dc.identifier.cristin1810893
dc.source.articlenumber42en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal