Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTerpstra, Tom
dc.contributor.authorGol, Janna M
dc.contributor.authorLucassen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHouwen, Juul
dc.contributor.authorvan Dulmen, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Marjolein Y
dc.contributor.authorRosmalen, Judith G. M
dc.contributor.authorolde Hartman, Tim C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T10:47:22Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T10:47:22Z
dc.date.created2021-01-27T21:50:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTerpstra, T., Gol, J. M., Lucassen, P. L., Houwen, J., van Dulmen, S., Berger, M. Y., ... & olde Hartman, T. C. (2020). Explanations for medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative study on GPs in daily practice consultations. Family practice, 37(1).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0263-2136
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735491
dc.description.abstractBackground: General practice is the centre of care for patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Providing explanations for MUS, i.e. making sense of symptoms, is considered to be an important part of care for MUS patients. However, little is known how general practitioners (GPs) do this in daily practice. Objective: This study aimed to explore how GPs explain MUS to their patients during daily general practice consultations. Methods: A thematic content analysis was performed of how GPs explained MUS to their patients based on 39 general practice consultations involving patients with MUS. Results: GP provided explanations in nearly all consultations with MUS patients. Seven categories of explanation components emerged from the data: defining symptoms, stating causality, mentioning contributing factors, describing mechanisms, excluding explanations, discussing the severity of symptoms and normalizing symptoms. No pattern of how GPs constructed explanations with the various categories was observed. In general, explanations were communicated as a possibility and in a patient-specific way; however, they were not very detailed. Conclusion: Although explanations for MUS are provided in most MUS consultations, there seems room for improving the explanations given in these consultations. Further studies on the effectiveness of explanations and on the interaction between patients and GP in constructing these explanations are required in order to make MUS explanations more suitable in daily primary care practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleExplanations for medically unexplained symptoms: A qualitative study on GPs in daily practice consultationsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s).en_US
dc.source.pagenumber124-130en_US
dc.source.volume37en_US
dc.source.journalFamily Practiceen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmz032
dc.identifier.cristin1880800
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal