Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorYoussef, Islam
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T09:04:04Z
dc.date.available2020-01-30T09:04:04Z
dc.date.created2019-11-22T19:08:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationGlossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2019, 4 (1), 1-36.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2397-1835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2638781
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe R sound exhibits considerable variability both across and within Arabic dialects; one that covers place and manner of articulation, as well as the notorious emphatic-plain distinction. Some R phones are in contrastive distribution, while others are contextually conditioned or free variants. This article aims to establish the underlying R phonemes in the spoken varieties of Arabic, evidence of which is sought in R’s dialect-specific phonological behavior: in minimal pair contrasts, distributional phenomena, loanword phonology, and phonological processes that target or are triggered by R. Investigation of such evidence reveals four major patterns based on the nature and number of R phonemes, consequently classifying Arabic dialects into four types: the split-R dialects (primarily Maghrebi and Egyptian dialect groups), the emphatic-R dialects (the Levantine group), the plain-R dialects (the Gulf group together with most peripheral dialects), and the uvular-R dialects (the qeltu-dialects of Mesopotamia). The analysis employs a minimalist, contrast-based model of feature geometry to characterize aspects of the attested R’s – such as emphatic-ness, coronality, dorsality, and sonority – and shows that the typology is directly mirrored in the representation. This has theoretical implications as well. Diverse rhotic representations within closely related language varieties demonstrate that distinctive features should not be interpreted as rigidly as is often assumed, and call attention to the semi-arbitrary relationship between phonetics and phonology.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe phonology and micro-typology of Arabic Rnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2019 The Author(s).nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-36nb_NO
dc.source.volume4nb_NO
dc.source.journalGlossa: a journal of general linguisticsnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/gjgl.1002
dc.identifier.cristin1751265
cristin.unitcode222,59,2,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for språk og litteratur
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal