dc.contributor.author | Dalen, Christer | |
dc.contributor.author | Ruscio, David Luigi Di | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-13T12:58:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-13T12:58:41Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-12-14T14:12:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Modeling, Identification and Control. 2016, 37 (4), 213-223. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0332-7353 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2471199 | |
dc.description.abstract | Some methods for transient closed loop step response system identification presented in the literature are reviewed. Interestingly some errors in a method published in the early 80’s where propagated into a recently published method. These methods are reviewed and some improved methods are suggested and presented. The methods are compared against each other on some closed loop system examples, e.g. a well pipeline-riser severe-slugging flow regime example, using Monte Carlo simulations for comparison of the methods. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | On closed loop transient response system identification | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 213-223 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 37 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Modeling, Identification and Control | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 4 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4173/mic.2016.4.2 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1412761 | |
cristin.unitcode | 222,58,2,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for elektro, IT og kybernetikk | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |