Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHagen, Lene Aarvelta
dc.contributor.authorGilson, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorBaraas, Rigmor C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T12:07:06Z
dc.date.available2024-08-15T12:07:06Z
dc.date.created2024-01-15T19:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationHagen, L. A., Gilson, S. J., & Baraas, R. C. (2023). The need for cycloplegic refraction in adolescents and young adults. Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science, 16(1), 1–7.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1891-0882
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3146569
dc.description.abstractCycloplegic refraction is considered the gold standard method when examining children and for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment within epidemiological studies. Recent reports underline that cycloplegia is equally important for ensuring accurate refractive error assessment in Chinese adolescents and young adults (Sun et al., 2018). The aim of this study was to assess whether cycloplegia is of equal importance for refractive error assessment in Norwegian adolescents and young adults. Non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction (Huvitz HRK-8000A), and cycloplegic ocular biometry (IOLMaster 700), were undertaken in 215 Norwegian adolescents (101 males) aged 16–17 years. Topical cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% was used for cycloplegia. Two years later, autorefraction and ocular biometry were repeated in 93 of the participants (34 males), both non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive errors (SER = sphere + ½ cylinder) were more myopic (less hyperopic) than cycloplegic SER in 93.6% of the participants (overall mean ± SD difference in SER: -0.59 ±0.50 D, 95% limit of agreement: -1.58–0.39 D). Refractive error classification by non-cycloplegic SER underestimated the hyperopia frequency (10.4% vs. 41.4%; SER ≥ +0.75 D) and overestimated the myopia frequency (12.1% vs.10.7%; SER ≤ -0.75 D), as compared with refractive error classification by cycloplegic SER. Mean crystalline lens thickness decreased and mean anterior chamber depth increased with cycloplegia, with the largest changes in the hyperopes compared with the emmetropes and myopes (p ≤ 0.04). The individual differences between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic SER varied by more than ±0.25 D between first and second visit for 31% of the participants. Accurate baseline measurements — as well as follow-up measurements — are imperative for deciding when and what to prescribe for myopic and hyperopic children, adolescents, and young adults. The results here confirm that cycloplegia is necessary to ensure accurate measurement of refractive errors in Norwegian adolescents and young adults.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://open.lnu.se/index.php/sjovs/article/view/3481/3432
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe need for cycloplegic refraction in adolescents and young adultsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Lene A. Hagen, Stuart J. Gilson, Rigmor C. Baraas.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-7en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Scienceen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15626/sjovs.v16i1.3481
dc.identifier.cristin2227198
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal