Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCox Née Dawkins, Shereen
dc.contributor.authorSolbakk, Jan Helge
dc.contributor.authorLuthardt, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorBernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T09:14:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-05T09:14:44Z
dc.date.created2023-03-21T11:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCox, S., Solbakk, J. H., Luthardt, F., & Bernabe, R. D. (2023). Institutional Review Boards and post-approval monitoring (PAM) of human research: content analysis of select university (academic health center) web pages across the USA. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 39(3), 341–350.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-7995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132640
dc.description.abstractObjective: To conduct a content analysis of IRB webpages of select universities (academic health centers) in the USA that describe post IRB- approval monitoring activities. Method: This was a qualitative study. Thematic analysis was the method to review the webpage content of selected academic health centers (AHC) within the USA. Results: Some US academic health “centers” IRB administrative or research compliance offices conduct post- approval monitoring (PAM) of human subjects’ research including clinical trials. The goals of this PAM programmes are to (a) ensure compliance to approved protocols, (b) preserve research integrity, (c) manage institutional risks, d) provide advisory/educational support to researchers, (e) recommend corrective actions for identified issues, and most importantly, (f) to protect the safety, rights, and well-being of research participants. Although not a requirement by law, the PAM program has legislative support in the US Code of Federal Regulations as part of the US Office for Human Research Protection’s (OHRP) Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). This is especially for institutions that conduct studies funded by the Federal government. PAM on-site checks reveal various incidents of protocol deviations and violations. This includes issues with recruitment processes, informed consent discrepancies, and incidents of non-compliance. When a study protocol is identified as non-compliant, the principal investigator works with the PAM monitor to develop a corrective action plan that would allow the study to become compliant and avoid sanctions from the IRB or the regulatory authority. Conclusions: REC/IRB post-approval monitoring of clinical trials is a valuable mechanism of protection for research participants while giving educational and quality assurance support to researchers. The program enables early detection and resolution of non-compliance to approved protocols. The impact of the program in the USA requires further exploration.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInstitutional Review Boards and post-approval monitoring (PAM) of human research: content analysis of select university (academic health center) web pages across the USAen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s).en_US
dc.source.pagenumber341-350en_US
dc.source.volume39en_US
dc.source.journalCurrent Medical Research and Opinionen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2175999
dc.identifier.cristin2135649
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal