Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBakke, Kine Mari
dc.contributor.authorMeltzer, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorGrøvik, Endre
dc.contributor.authorNegård, Anne
dc.contributor.authorHolmedal, Stein Harald
dc.contributor.authorGjesdal, Kjell-Inge
dc.contributor.authorBjørnerud, Atle
dc.contributor.authorRee, Anne Hansen
dc.contributor.authorRedalen, Kathrine
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T13:06:58Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T13:06:58Z
dc.date.created2020-11-25T22:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBakke, K. M., Meltzer, S., Grøvik, E., Negård, A., Holmedal, S. H., Gjesdal, K.-I., Bjørnerud, A., Ree, A. H. & Redalen, K. R. (2020). Sex Differences and Tumor Blood Flow from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Are Associated with Treatment Response after Chemoradiation and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer. Radiology, 297(2), 352-360.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766551
dc.description.abstractSex differences, tumor vascularity, and blood flow seen on multiecho dynamic contrast–based MRI scans enabled prediction of treatment response and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer. Background: MRI is the standard tool for rectal cancer staging. However, more precise diagnostic tests that can assess biologic tumor features decisive for treatment outcome are necessary. Tumor perfusion and hypoxia are two important features; however, no reference methods that measure these exist in clinical use. Purpose: To assess the potential predictive and prognostic value of MRI-assessed rectal cancer perfusion, as a surrogate measure of hypoxia, for local treatment response and survival. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, 94 study participants were enrolled from October 2013 to December 2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01816607). Participants had histologically confirmed rectal cancer and underwent routine diagnostic MRI, an extended diffusion-weighted sequence, and a multiecho dynamic contrast agent–based sequence. Predictive and prognostic values of dynamic contrast-enhanced, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), and intravoxel incoherent motion MRI were investigated with response to neoadjuvant treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival as end points. Secondary objectives investigated potential sex differences in MRI parameters and relationship with lymph node stage. Statistical methods used were Cox regression, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 94 study participants (mean age, 64 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 61 men) were evaluated. Baseline tumor blood flow from DSC MRI was lower in patients who had poor local tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment (96 mL/min/100 g ± 33 for ypT2–4, 120 mL/min/100 g ± 21 for ypT0–1; P = .01), shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.98; P < .001), and shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.98, 0.99; P < .001). Women had higher blood flow (125 mL/min/100 g ± 27) than men (74 mL/min/100 g ± 26, P < .001) at stage 4. Volume transfer constant and plasma volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as well as ΔR2* peak and area under the curve for 30 and 60 seconds from DSC MRI were associated with local malignant lymph nodes (pN status). Median area under the curve for 30 seconds was 0.09 arbitrary units (au) ± 0.03 for pN1–2 and 0.19 au ± 0.12 for pN0 (P = .001). Conclusion: Low tumor blood flow from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI was associated with poor treatment response in study participants with rectal cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectMagnetisk resonans tomografi, MRIen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging, MRIen_US
dc.subjectKreftdiagnostikken_US
dc.subjectCancer diagnosticsen_US
dc.titleSex differences and tumor blood flow from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI are associated with treatment response after chemoradiation and long-term survival in rectal canceren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© RSNA, 2020.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinsk teknologi: 620en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical technology: 620en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinsk teknologi: 620en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical technology: 620en_US
dc.source.pagenumber352-360en_US
dc.source.volume297en_US
dc.source.journalRadiologyen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.2020200287
dc.identifier.cristin1852539
dc.relation.projectAkershus universitetssykehus HF: 267940, 268938en_US
dc.relation.projectHelse Sør-Øst RHF: 2014012, 2015048, 2016050en_US
dc.relation.projectKreftforeningen: 198116-2018en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel