Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSaltveit, Svein Jakob
dc.contributor.authorBrabrand, Åge
dc.contributor.authorJuarez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorStickler, Morten
dc.contributor.authorDønnum, Bjørn Otto
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T14:08:19Z
dc.date.available2021-01-15T14:08:19Z
dc.date.created2020-10-20T11:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSaltveit, S. J., Brabrand, Å., Juárez, A., Stickler, M., & Dønnum, B. O. (2020). The Impact of Hydropeaking on Juvenile Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in a Norwegian Regulated River. Sustainability, 12(20), 8670.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2723315
dc.description.abstractThe Norwegian electrical energy supply system is based on hydropower. The now deregulated energy market has led to increased use of hydropeaking production, leading to greater fluctuations in discharge and water levels below hydropower stations. The power station HOL 1, with an outlet to the Storåne River, is a large hydropeaking facility. With over 300 rapid flow increases and decreases per year since 2012, it is a river subjected to frequent hydropeaking. To quantify the stranding risk downstream of the power plant, the effect of a series of different turbine shutdown scenarios was simulated in an earlier study. The residual flow of 6 m3·s−1 and a full production of 66 m3·s−1 were considered as the baselines for the calculation of dewatered areas. A three-year study of juvenile fish density both upstream as a reference and downstream of the power plant was undertaken. There were very low densities or even an absence of brown trout (Salmo trutta) older than young-of-the-year (YoY) below the outlet of the power station, despite high densities of YoY in previous years. This is probably due to the large and rapid changes in flow below the power station. Hydropeaking has less impact on the earliest life stages of brown trout during spring and summer, as well as on spawning and egg development during winter. This is attributed spawning in late autumn occurring at a low flow seldom reached during hydropeaking. The high survival of YoY during the first summer and early autumn is likely due to a lower frequency of hydropeaking and higher residual flows, leaving a larger wetted area.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe impact of hydropeaking on juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a Norwegian regulated riveren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 by the authors.en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalSustainabilityen_US
dc.source.issue20en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12208670
dc.identifier.cristin1840822
dc.source.articlenumber8670en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal