Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRahmati, Omid
dc.contributor.authorGhorbanzadeh, Omid
dc.contributor.authorTeimurian, Teimur
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, Farnoush
dc.contributor.authorTiefenbacher, John P.
dc.contributor.authorFalah, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.authorPirasteh, Saied
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Phuong-Thao Thi
dc.contributor.authorTien Bui, Dieu
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T09:32:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-17T09:32:19Z
dc.date.created2019-12-17T13:04:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing. 2019, 11 (24), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647116
dc.descriptionLicensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licenseen_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough snow avalanches are among the most destructive natural disasters, and result in losses of life and economic damages in mountainous regions, far too little attention has been paid to the prediction of the snow avalanche hazard using advanced machine learning (ML) models. In this study, the applicability and efficiency of four ML models: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB) and generalized additive model (GAM), for snow avalanche hazard mapping, were evaluated. Fourteen geomorphometric, topographic and hydrologic factors were selected as predictor variables in the modeling. This study was conducted in the Darvan and Zarrinehroud watersheds of Iran. The goodness-of-fit and predictive performance of the models was evaluated using two statistical measures: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the true skill statistic (TSS). Finally, an ensemble model was developed based upon the results of the individual models. Results show that, among individual models, RF was best, performing well in both the Darvan (AUROC = 0.964, TSS = 0.862) and Zarrinehroud (AUROC = 0.956, TSS = 0.881) watersheds. The accuracy of the ensemble model was slightly better than all individual models for generating the snow avalanche hazard map, as validation analyses showed an AUROC = 0.966 and a TSS = 0.865 in the Darvan watershed, and an AUROC value of 0.958 and a TSS value of 0.877 for the Zarrinehroud watershed. The results indicate that slope length, lithology and relative slope position (RSP) are the most important factors controlling snow avalanche distribution. The methodology developed in this study can improve risk-based decision making, increases the credibility and reliability of snow avalanche hazard predictions and can provide critical information for hazard managersen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSpatial Modeling of Snow Avalanche Using Machine Learning Models and Geo-Environmental Factors: Comparison of Effectiveness in Two Mountain Regionsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 by the authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber26en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs11242995
dc.identifier.cristin1761900
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal