Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaraldsen, Heidi Marian
dc.contributor.authorHalvari, Halgeir
dc.contributor.authorSolstad, Bård Erlend
dc.contributor.authorAbrahamsen, Frank Eirik
dc.contributor.authorNordin-Bates, Sanna M.
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology. 2019, 10 (June).nb_NO
dc.descriptionhis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractConceptualized within the framework of self-determination theory, the aim of the current study was to investigate the relation between perfectionistic concerns and (a) controlled (non-self-determined) motivation and (b) performance anxiety through basic psychological need frustration (frustration of competence, autonomy, and realtedness), and if these relations would be moderated by controlling teaching/coaching conditions. We used a cross-sectional moderated mediation design and purposefully selected Norwegian elite junior performers (N = 171; mean age = 17.3; SD age = 0.94) from talent development schools, who completed an online questionnaire to report their perceptions of the study variables. Associations were examined using structural equation modeling. The results showed that perfectionistic concerns were positively associated with controlling conditions, basic needs frustration, controlled motivation, and performance anxiety. Reported controlling teaching/coaching conditions moderated the positive indirect relationship between perfectionistic concerns and (a) controlled motivation and (b) performance anxiety through competence need frustration. Specifically, these indirect associations were evident for performers reporting moderate or high levels of controlling teaching/coaching conditions. In contrast, there were no indirect associations via competence need frustration for those performers who reported low levels of controlling conditions. In conclusion, the results indicate that perfectionistic concerns appear to be a vulnerability factor that exposes elite junior performers to higher risks of entering a debilitative motivational process. This seems especially likely when exposed to controlling teaching/coaching conditions. Coaches and teachers working with elite junior performers should avoid using controlling mechanisms and instead foster autonomous functioning.nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleThe Role of Perfectionism and Controlling Conditions in Norwegian Elite Junior Performers’ Motivational Processesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.rights.holder2019 Haraldsen, Halvari, Solstad, Abrahamsen and Nordin-Bates.nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologynb_NO
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for økonomi, markedsføring og jus

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal