Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorsen, Arne O.
dc.contributor.authorSmistad, Harris J.
dc.contributor.authorTveit, Håkon
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Ole C.
dc.contributor.authorBjørtuft, Vegard G.
dc.contributor.authorFuruvik, Nora Cecilie Ivarsdatter
dc.contributor.authorMoldestad, Britt Margrethe Emilie
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T09:44:33Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T09:44:33Z
dc.date.created2018-11-29T17:18:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedings. 2018, (153), 255-262.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1650-3686
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2580620
dc.descriptionProceedings of The 59th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norwaynb_NO
dc.description.abstractUse of fossil fuel has resulted in emission of large amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere, which increases the risk of global heating. There is a lot of research going on regarding CO2 capture and storage. The Paris Agreement, a global agreement on the reduction of the climate change, was adopted in December 2015 and signed by 174 countries in April 2016. The agreement aims to keep the global temperature rise in this century well below two degrees Celsius. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), about 120 billion tons of CO2 have to be captured and stored in the period from 2015 to 2050 to ensure that the increase in temperature will be kept below this limit. This implies that more than 3000 carbon capture and storage plants must be operative within 2050. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate has estimated that the theoretical storage capacity on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is 80 billion tons of CO2. As a comparison, Norwegian emission of CO2 is about 50 million tons per year. The purpose of this paper is to simulate the storage of CO2 in an aquifer in the North Sea. Simulations using OLGA and Rocx are carried out on a limited part of the aquifer. Three different cases where run to study the distribution of CO2 in the aquifer with time and the CO2 storage. By comparing the cases, it was found that in all the cases CO2 was evenly distributed in the aquifer with time independent on the injection area and the length of the production well compared to the length of the aquifer. The CO2 storage was calculated to be 2590 ton, 3795 ton and 2560 ton for Case 0, Case 1 and Case 2 respectively. Case 2 had a CO2 injection area of 21m2, whereas Case 0 and Case 1 had a simulated injection area of 10605 m2 and 21210 m2. Case 2, with the smallest injection area, is the most relevant case because real injection of CO2 occurs through orifices in vertical or horizontal injectors.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSimulation of CO2 storage in the North Seanb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber255-262nb_NO
dc.source.journalLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedingsnb_NO
dc.source.issue153nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3384/ecp18153255
dc.identifier.cristin1637147
cristin.unitcode222,58,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for prosess-, energi- og miljøteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal