• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • 3 Masteroppgaver
  • Master i natur-, helse- og miljøvern
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • 3 Masteroppgaver
  • Master i natur-, helse- og miljøvern
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The effect of hunting bans on population development in the willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) in Norway

Moen, Anthine
Master thesis
Published version
Thumbnail
View/Open
2020_Master_Moen.pdf (576.8Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2721133
Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master i natur-, helse- og miljøvern [206]
Abstract
The willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) is by far the most popular small game species in Norway, and it is hunted annually throughout the country. However, during the last 20 years it has experienced a continuous decline, and this has raised serious conservation concerns among wildlife managers. Several management actions have been implemented to mitigate this decline (e.g. geographical zoning, daily bag limits, reduced hunting periods), but more recently the use of complete hunting bans has been applied by a number of hunting districts. However, little is still known about the effects on population development of such bans. Here, I investigate the immediate (one year after the ban) and short-term (two years after the ban) density effects of hunting bans to see if such a management strategy would be effective in mitigating population declines. In calculating population development, I used two density measures: population growth rate (λ) and true density (i.e. a yearly change in the number of individuals), which were based on line-transect data from 96 hunting districts in Norway. I found an immediate positive effect on population development after a hunting ban, both when comparing the preceding five years and the last year before a ban to the first year after a ban. This effect was stronger for banned areas compared to both regulated and hunted areas. I also found a stronger positive effect for longer bans (1-year vs. 2-year), but this was only significant for measures of density. It is therefore to be concluded that future management should aim to prolong bans in areas when needed in order to see a true positive effect of hunting bans.
Publisher
University of South-Eastern Norway
Copyright
Copyright The Author

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit