Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVarsi, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorStenehjem, Aud Eldrid
dc.contributor.authorBørøsund, Elin
dc.contributor.authorSolberg Nes, Lise
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T14:01:12Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T14:01:12Z
dc.date.created2021-07-07T13:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationVarsi, C., Stenehjem, A.-E., Børøsund, E. & Solberg Nes, L. (2021). Video as an alternative to in-person consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up: a qualitative study. BMC Nephrology, 22, Artikkel 105.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2369
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838520
dc.description.abstractBackground: Renal transplant recipients have to see a nephrologist for regular follow-up for the rest of their lives. To reduce the burden for the patients, video consultation can be an alternative to traditional in-person hospital consultations. The aim of the current study was, from the perspectives of patients and health care providers, to investigate the perceived benefits and challenges of using video consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up. Methods: Patients (i.e., renal transplant recipients; n = 18) alternated between regular in-person follow-up consultations and video consultations. Patients and health care providers were then invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Patients interviewed (n = 15) were median 53 years old (range 37–64) and 53% female. The video consultation solution used in the study turned out to have major technical deficiencies. Despite the technical challenges, however, the majority of the patients reported appreciating being able to alternate between video and in-person hospital consultations. Main benefits reported included not needing to travel to the hospital and thereby saving time, less focus on being chronically ill and potential economic benefits for patients and society. The health care providers (n = 3) also valued the benefits provided by the use of video consultations, but described the reoccurring technical challenges as disruptive. The fact that patients were in a stable phase of their health condition and already had an established, trusting relationship with their nephrologist, acted as facilitators for success. Possible challenges and harms described included concerns related to security, confidentiality and interruptions, as well as the potential need for physical examinations. Conclusions: Benefits from using video consultations as an alternative to in-person consultations may outweigh potential technological challenges for patients as well as health care providers. A long-lasting mutually trusting relationship between patient and provider may be an important prerequisite for the experienced benefits of using video consultation. Findings also indicate that starting such care delivery changes in a small-scale, with a few selected patients in a stable phase of their condition, may be an important factor for success.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleVideo as an alternative to in-person consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up: a qualitative studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2021.en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Nephrologyen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02284-3
dc.identifier.cristin1920716
dc.source.articlenumber105en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal