Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPham, Binh Thai
dc.contributor.authorPhong, Tran Van
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Huu Duy
dc.contributor.authorQi, Chongchong
dc.contributor.authorAl-Ansari, Nadhir
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Ata
dc.contributor.authorHo, Lanh Si
dc.contributor.authorTuyen, Tran Thi
dc.contributor.authorYen, Hoang Phan Hai
dc.contributor.authorLy, Hai-Bang
dc.contributor.authorPrakash, Indra
dc.contributor.authorTien Bui, Dieu
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T12:03:44Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T12:03:44Z
dc.date.created2020-01-27T12:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPham, B. T., Phong, T. V., Nguyen, H. D., Qi, C., Al-Ansari, N., Amini, A., ... & Tien Bui, D. (2020). A comparative study of kernel logistic regression, radial basis function classifier, multinomial naïve bayes, and logistic model tree for flash flood susceptibility mapping. Water, 12(1).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2736618
dc.description.abstractRisk of flash floods is currently an important problem in many parts of Vietnam. In this study, we used four machine-learning methods, namely Kernel Logistic Regression (KLR), Radial Basis Function Classifier (RBFC), Multinomial Naïve Bayes (NBM), and Logistic Model Tree (LMT) to generate flash flood susceptibility maps at the minor part of Nghe An province of the Center region (Vietnam) where recurrent flood problems are being experienced. Performance of these four methods was evaluated to select the best method for flash flood susceptibility mapping. In the model studies, ten flash flood conditioning factors, namely soil, slope, curvature, river density, flow direction, distance from rivers, elevation, aspect, land use, and geology, were chosen based on topography and geo-environmental conditions of the site. For the validation of models, the area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Area Under Curve (AUC), and various statistical indices were used. The results indicated that performance of all the models is good for generating flash flood susceptibility maps (AUC = 0.983–0.988). However, performance of LMT model is the best among the four methods (LMT: AUC = 0.988; KLR: AUC = 0.985; RBFC: AUC = 0.984; and NBM: AUC = 0.983). The present study would be useful for the construction of accurate flash flood susceptibility maps with the objectives of identifying flood-susceptible areas/zones for proper flash flood risk management.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Kernel Logistic Regression, Radial Basis Function Classifier, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Model Tree for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mappingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s).en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalWateren_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w12010239
dc.identifier.cristin1782943
dc.source.articlenumber239en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal