Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRabetino, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorKohtamäki, Marko
dc.contributor.authorFederico, Juan
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T10:51:36Z
dc.date.available2020-12-03T10:51:36Z
dc.date.created2020-12-02T10:00:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M. & Federico, J. S. A (Re)view of the Philosophical Foundations of Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 151-190.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1460-8545
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2711667
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to review how different approaches to social inquiry (e.g. positivist, postpositivist, interpretive, postmodernist and critical theory) have been used in strategy research and how these main paradigms engage with strategy. In a fragmented domain, debates typically match paradigms to schools of thought and use the paradigm concept, sometimes even promiscuously, to examine the underlying premises of different theories. Thus, scholars tend to overlook the debate on philosophical meta‐theoretical assumptions (ontological, epistemological and methodological) and prefer onto‐epistemological approaches that are considered to be ‘normal science’, which underestimate the contributions of certain less traditional streams of research. This review offers a fresh view of the philosophical foundations of the strategic literature by combining author co‐citation and content analysis of a sample of academic sources and analyses both the meta‐theoretical assumptions and the basic paradigmatic assumptions for central constructs that strategy researchers attach to their frameworks (e.g. strategy, environment, firm and strategist). This endeavour enables scholars who work in a multidisciplinary field to gain a better understanding of the philosophical beliefs, principles and conventions held by different research communities and theoretical approaches. Exposing the underlying assumptions, as is done in this study, is a key step in theory development. Hence, this review can help researchers, young scholars and doctoral students navigate a confusing research landscape, problematize the existing literature and set new research questions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA (Re)view of the Philosophical Foundations of Strategic Managementen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Management Reviews published by British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber151-190
dc.source.volume23
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Management Reviewsen_US
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244
dc.identifier.cristin1855177
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal