Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGulløy, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorMoshuus, Geir H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T13:13:55Z
dc.date.available2020-03-12T13:13:55Z
dc.date.created2020-01-20T17:25:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationNordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE). 2019, 3 (3), 109-126.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2535-4051
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2646604
dc.descriptionThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study investigates a common assumption from previous decades of educational sociology: Educational resistance seems to go hand in hand with strong local identity and belonging. In the early 1990s, the Norwegian sociologist Gunnar Jørgensen (1993) analysed how young people developed certain social roles in interactions with school and the local community. Based on school survey data from 2018, we present a quantitative analysis where we compared school rootedness and local community rootedness among students according to their educational resources. The study population consisted of students in upper secondary schools in Telemark, South-Eastern Norway (N=3510). Research questions: 1) Do students with less educational resources express less school rootedness and more local community rootedness compared to students with more educational resources? 2) Do students with less educational resources participate more in e-leisure, compared to students with more educational resources? The analysis showed that students with less educational resources expressed less school rootedness compared to students with more educational resources. Contrary to common assumptions as well as findings from Jørgensen’s study, students with less educational resources expressed less local community rootedness compared to other students. Furthermore, such students had higher frequencies with heavy e-leisure participation compared to other students, and more of them had friends with whom they only stayed in touch through the Internet. We discuss results in relation to “the schooled society” thesis (Baker, 2014), youth culture, and place theory. Finally, we question whether the classic geographical term placelessness (Relph, 1976) is appropriate to describe young students in lack of educational resources.en_US
dc.language.isonoben_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleStedsløse slaur - Ungdom, skole og lokal forankringen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2019 Elisabeth Gulløy, Geir H Moshuusen_US
dc.source.pagenumber109-126en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalNordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7577/njcie.3314
dc.identifier.cristin1778397
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal