Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSveinsdottir, Vigdis
dc.contributor.authorLie, Stein Atle
dc.contributor.authorBond, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.contributor.authorGrasdal, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorReme, Silje Endresen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T12:32:27Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T12:32:27Z
dc.date.created2019-10-25T10:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2019, 46 (1), 50-59.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0355-3140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2639572
dc.descriptionThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractObjectives Individual placement and support (IPS) is an effective approach for helping people with severe mental illness gain employment. This study aimed to investigate if IPS can be effectively repurposed to support young adults at risk of early work disability due to various social and health related problems. Methods A randomized controlled trial including 96 young adults (18‒29 years; 68% men) was conducted in Norway. Participants were not in employment, education, or training, received temporary benefits due to social or health-related problems, and were eligible for traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Participants were randomized to IPS (N=50) or TVR (N=46). Self-reported data were collected at baseline and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. The primary outcome was obtaining any paid employment in the competitive labor market during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were physical and mental health, well-being, coping, alcohol consumption, and drug use. Results Significantly more IPS participants obtained competitive employment compared to TVR participants during 12-months follow-up (48% versus 8%; odds ratio 10.39, 95% confidence interval 2.79‒38.68). The IPS group reported significantly better outcomes than the TVR group in subjective health complaints, helplessness, and hopelessness. In post hoc analyses adjusted for baseline and missing data, the IPS group reported significantly better outcomes on these measures in addition to level of disability, optimism about future well-being, and drug use. Conclusions IPS is effective for young adults at risk of early work disability. IPS was superior to TVR in increasing competitive employment and promoted improvements in some non-vocational outcomes. IPS services should be offered to improve employment rates in this vulnerable group.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIndividual placement and support for young adults at risk of early work disability (the SEED trial). A randomized controlled trialnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber50-59nb_NO
dc.source.volume46nb_NO
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Healthnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.5271/sjweh.3837
dc.identifier.cristin1740517
cristin.unitcode222,56,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse-, sosial- og velferdsfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal