Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAgu, Cornelius Emeka
dc.contributor.authorMoldestad, Britt Margrethe Emilie
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T09:06:42Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T09:06:42Z
dc.date.created2018-11-29T16:56:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedings. 2018, (153), 248-254.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1650-3686
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585145
dc.description.abstractDespite several advantages of a gas distributor, there are also some challenges in its application. Using a gas distributor increases the fluidizing gas compression cost. Due to deposition of fine particles and product of chemical corrosion, the gas flow area across a distributor may also be reduced. This paper investigates the distribution of solids in a fluidized bed operated without a gas distributor. The gas supply is through two opposite points on the column wall. In this bed configuration, the fluidized bed behaviour simulated using the CPFD (Computational Particle-Fluid dynamics) Barracuda code is compared with an equivalent system where a uniform gas distribution is assumed. For different powders with mean size 480 – 710 µm, the results show that the axial distribution of pressure fluctuation in both types of bed configurations are similar, particularly near the bottom of the bed. The relative solid fraction fluctuation is lower than 0.2 around the central axis and it spans over 21 – 83% and 41 – 65% of the bed diameter, respectively. These results therefore show that stable bubbling behaviour and good distribution of solids can also be achieved in a bed operated without any distributor.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractDistribution of Solids in a Fluidized Bed Operated without a Gas Distributornb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDistribution of Solids in a Fluidized Bed Operated without a Gas Distributornb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber248-254nb_NO
dc.source.journalLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedingsnb_NO
dc.source.issue153nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3384/ecp18153248
dc.identifier.cristin1637133
cristin.unitcode222,58,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for prosess-, energi- og miljøteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal