Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Tone Langjordet
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorBaste, Valborg
dc.contributor.authorIndahl, Aage
dc.contributor.authorOdéen, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2018, 0. (0). 1-12.nb_NO
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible difference between the Modified atWork intervention (MAW) and the Original atWork intervention (OAW) on sick leave and other health related outcomes. atWork is a group intervention using the workplace as an arena for distribution of evidence-based knowledge about musculoskeletal and mental health complaints. Methods A cluster randomized controlled trial with 93 kindergartens, comprising a total of 1011 employees, was conducted. Kindergartens were stratified by county and size and randomly allocated to MAW (45 clusters, 324 respondents) or OAW (48 clusters, 313 respondents). The randomization and intervention allocation processes were concealed. There was no blinding to group allocation. Primary outcome was register data on sick leave at cluster level. Secondary outcomes were health complaints, job satisfaction, social support, coping, and beliefs about musculoskeletal and mental health complaints, measured at the individual level. Results The MAW group reduced sick leave by 5.7% during the intervention year, while the OAW group had a 7.5% increase. Overall, the changes were not statistically significant, and no difference was detected between groups, based on 45 and 47 kindergartens. Compared to the OAW group, the MAW group had a smaller reduction for two of the statements concerning faulty beliefs about back pain, but believed less in the hereditary nature of depression. Conclusions The MAW did not have a different effect on sick leave at cluster level compared to the OAW.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipVestfold Hospital Trustnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringer USnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleEffect of Reassuring Information About Musculoskeletal and Mental Health Complaints at the Workplace: A Cluster Randomized Trial of the atWork Interventionnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeEffect of Reassuring Information About Musculoskeletal and Mental Health Complaints at the Workplace: A Cluster Randomized Trial of the atWork Interventionnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2018.nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of occupational rehabilitationnb_NO
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse-, sosial- og velferdsfag

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal