Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorErgon, Rolf
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-21T07:38:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T12:49:57Z
dc.date.available2009-01-21T07:38:08Z
dc.date.available2017-04-19T12:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Chemometrics 21(2007), No. 12, p. 537-546
dc.identifier.issn0886-9383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2438430
dc.description.abstractThe paper is considering the following question: using principal component regression (PCR) or partial least squares regression (PLSR), how much data can be removed from X while retaining the original ability to predict Y? Two model reduction methods using similarity transformations are discussed, one giving projections of original loadings onto the column space of the fitted response matrix (essentially the orthogonal signal correction (OSC) methods), and one giving projections of original scores onto the column space of the coefficient matrix (essentially the net analyte signal (NAS) methods). The loading projection method gives model residuals that are orthogonal to Y and , which is valuable in certain applications. The score projection method, on the other hand, gives model residuals that are orthogonal to , which is essential in other applications. It is shown that the reduced matrix X from the score projection method is a subset of the reduced matrix X from the loading projection method. It therefore has the smallest Frobenius norm, and thus the smallest total column variance, assuming centered data.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectPCR/PLSR model reduction
dc.subjectSimilarity transformations
dc.subjectOPLS
dc.subjectNAS
dc.subjectMinimum Y-relevant part
dc.subjectFrobenius form
dc.titleFinding Y-relevant part of X by use of PCR and PLSR model reduction methods
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.subject.nsi563
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cem.1062


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel