dc.contributor.author | Haugen, Finn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-22T13:43:37Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-19T12:49:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-22T13:43:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-19T12:49:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Modeling,Identification and Control 31(2010) Nr. 3, S.79-91 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1890-1328 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2438422 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper demonstrates a number of PI controller tuning methods being used to tune a temperature controller for a real air heater. Indices expressing setpoint tracking and disturbance compensation and stability margin (robustness) are calculated. From these indices and a personal impression about how quick a method is to deliver the tuning result and how simple it is to use, a winning method is identi ed. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Norwegian Society of Automatic Control | |
dc.subject | PI tuning | |
dc.subject | air heater | |
dc.title | Comparing PI Tuning Methods in a Real Benchmark Temperature Control System | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.description.version | Published version | |
dc.subject.nsi | 563 | |