Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTangvald-Pedersen, Olav
dc.contributor.authorBongaardt, Rob
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-10T11:49:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T12:44:44Z
dc.date.available2016-10-10T11:49:16Z
dc.date.available2017-04-19T12:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-28
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian journal of disability research (2016)
dc.identifier.issn1745-3011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2438336
dc.description.abstractThe current agreement that evidence-based practice is a merger of research evidence, clinical expertise and patient preferences has made service user involvement and participant research not only acceptable, but also called for and desired. However, what user involvement and participant research entails, and how best to implement it, is contestable and ideologically rooted. In this paper, we describe three different ideologies, a liberal, an emancipatory and a caring ideology, and we present their concomitant methodological solutions and preferences. Finally, we outline a tinkering participatory research method by borrowing from the above-mentioned ideological views. We would claim that this method balances well between the demands of scientific rigour and the expectations of ideological and social relevance
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcare
dc.subjectparticipant research
dc.subjectideology
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.titleTowards a tinkering participatory research method in mental health
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.rights.holder© 2016 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.122305


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/