Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGosselin, Jacinthe
dc.contributor.authorZedrosser, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSwenson, Jon
dc.contributor.authorPelletier, Fanie
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T09:09:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T20:40:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T12:24:26Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T09:09:57Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T20:40:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-19T12:24:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationGosselin, J., Zedrosser, A., Swenson, J. & Pelletier, F. The relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting mortality on the population dynamics of brown bears. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences 2014, 282(1798):
dc.identifier.issn1471-2954
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2437939
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing evidence of indirect effects of hunting on populations. In species with sexually selected infanticide (SSI), hunting may decrease juvenile survival by increasing male turnover. We aimed to evaluate the relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting via SSI on the population dynamics of the Scandinavian brown bear (Ursus arctos). We performed prospective and retrospective demographic perturbation analyses for periods with low and high hunting pressures. All demographic rates, except yearling survival, were lower under high hunting pressure, which led to a decline in population growth under high hunting pressure (λ = 0.975; 95% CI = 0.914-1.011). Hunting had negative indirect effects on the population through an increase in SSI, which lowered cub survival and possibly also fecundity rates. Our study suggests that SSI could explain 13.6% of the variation in population growth. Hunting also affected the relative importance of survival and fecundity of adult females for population growth, with fecundity being more important under low hunting pressure and survival more important under high hunting pressure. Our study sheds light on the importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting on population dynamics, and supports the contention that hunting can have indirect negative effects on populations through SSI.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttp://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1798/20141840
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectpopulation dynamics
dc.subjectharvesting
dc.subjectbrown bear
dc.subjectsexually selected infanticide
dc.subjectbehaviour
dc.subjectcarnivore
dc.titleThe relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting mortality on the population dynamics of brown bears
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.date.updated2014-12-19T09:09:57Z
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.rights.holder© 2014 The Authors
dc.subject.nsi488
dc.identifier.cristin1185369


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/